منابع مشابه
Content Internalism about Indexical Thought
Properly understood, content internalism is the thesis that any difference between the representational contents of two individuals’ mental states reduces to a difference in those individuals’ intrinsic properties. Some of the strongest arguments against internalism turn on the possibility for two “doppelgangers” – perfect physical and phenomenal duplicates – to differ with respect to the conte...
متن کاملShoemaker on Phenomenal Content
In a series of papers and lectures, Sydney Shoemaker has developed a sophisticated Russellian theory of phenomenal content (1994, 2000, 2001, 2003). It has as its central motivation two considerations. One is the possibility of spectrum-inversion without illusion. The other is the transparency of experience. Consider the possibility of spectrum inversion. It might be that the color experience J...
متن کاملWhat Does the Nation of China Think About Phenomenal States?
Critics of functionalism about the mind often rely on the intuition that collectivities cannot be conscious in motivating their positions. In this paper, we consider the merits of appealing to the intuition that there is nothing that it’s like to be a collectivity. We demonstrate that collective mentality is not an affront to commonsense, and we report evidence that demonstrates that the intuit...
متن کاملHow to study Folk Intuitions about Phenomenal Consciousness
The assumption that the concept of phenomenal consciousness is pretheoretical is often found in the philosophical debates on consciousness. Unfortunately, this assumption has not received the kind of empirical attention that it deserves. We suspect that this is in part due to difficulties that arise in attempting to test folk intuitions about consciousness. In this article we elucidate and defe...
متن کاملCOMMENTS ON SAuL KRIpKE’S A PUZZLE ABOUT TIME AND THOUGHT
the paper discusses an original and ingenious puzzle about time and thought due to Saul kripke. its connections with related issues and puz‐ zles such as Russell’s paradox and Kaplan’s puzzle are addressed and ex‐ plored. The problems raised by the puzzle are dealt with briefly, emphasizing the comparative worth of Kripke’s findings in terms of simplicity and mod‐ esty of its assumptions. Then ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophical Review
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0031-8108,1558-1470
DOI: 10.1215/00318108-2010-018